File manager

In his grand daydream, Pippin also imagined getting married and having a bunch of kids. “I’ll be the head of the house and boss everyone around,” he chuckled. He even pictured himself playfully kicking disobedient kids if they misbehaved.

But, oh my goodness! As he continued his imaginative kicks, he accidentally kicked the air so hard that he sent all the pots flying, and crash! They broke into a hundred pieces. Pippin’s dreams were instantly shattered.

Surprised and dismayed, Pippin looked at the broken pots and realized his big dreams had just turned into a big mess. “Well, that didn’t go as planned,” he mumbled to himself, scratching his head.

The village animals, who had been watching the whole scene, couldn’t help but giggle. A wise old owl hooted, “Maybe next time, don’t mix dreams of pots with dreams of kicking mischievous kids!”

Pippin laughed along with the animals, realizing the truth in the owl’s words. The moral of the story dawned on him: Dreams are wonderful, but it’s important to keep our feet on the ground and pay attention to what’s happening around us. So, dream big, but also be mindful of the pots in your life and take careful steps to turn those dreams into reality.

Mousy approached the saint and said, “Sir, I’m in trouble! The cat keeps chasing me, and I don’t know what to do. Can you please help me?”

The kind saint asked, “What kind of help do you need, little friend?”

Mousy replied, “I wish I could become a cat myself so that the big cat won’t bother me anymore.”

The saint thought for a moment and then said, “Alright, your wish is granted. You shall become a cat.”

Mousy was happy for a while, but soon he was back, looking sad. The saint asked, “What’s wrong now?”

Mousy sighed, “Now a dog is chasing me! Being a cat isn’t as easy as I thought.”

The saint chuckled and asked, “So, what would you like to be now?”

Mousy thought for a moment and said, “Maybe if I were a tiger, then no one would dare to chase me!”

The saint smiled and turned Mousy into a tiger. However, to everyone’s surprise, the tiger started staring at the saint with hungry eyes.

“Why are you looking at me like that? Do you want to eat me?” asked the saint.

The tiger nodded eagerly.

The saint, realizing the mistake, said, “Oh dear! You’ve forgotten the lesson. You should appreciate who you are and not try to be something else. Now, go back to being a mouse, and remember to be content with who you are.”

And just like that, Mousy turned back into a mouse but with a valuable lesson in his heart. From that day on, Mousy embraced being a mouse and learned that it’s okay to be oneself. The saint’s magic became a reminder that everyone has a special role to play, and trying to be something you’re not might lead to unexpected troubles.

The moral of the story is: Be happy with who you are because everyone is special in their own way.

Likewise, if we become proficient in understanding the rules/regulations/recommendations from the Gita, we will experience much freedom in life. We will be able to navigate through the most complex situations of life with confidence.

When unrighteousness (adharma) is prominent (abhibhavāt), the women of the family (kula-striyaḥ) are desecrated (praduṣyanti), and with the desecration (duṣṭāsu) of women (strīṣu), a discombobulated social division (varṇa-saṅkaraḥ) is generated (jāyate). (BG 1.40) Such societal confusion (saṅkaro) results only (eva) in hellish experience (narakāya) for the family (kulasya) as well as (ca) for those who destroy the family (kula-ghnānāṁ). The forefathers (pitaro) of such families (eṣāṁ) certainly (hy) fall down (patanti) because of the lost (lupta) culture of offering food and water to the departed forefathers (piṇḍodaka-kriyāḥ). (BG 1.41)

Owing to these (etaiḥ) faults (doṣair) of those who destroy the family tradition (kula-ghnānāṁ), discrepancies in social division (varṇa-saṅkara) are created (kārakaiḥ), and, social values (jāti-dharmāḥ) and (ca) everlasting (śāśvatāḥ) traditional family values (kula-dharmāś) are destroyed (utsādyante). (BG 1.42) Arjuna has heard (anuśuśruma) that human beings (manuṣyāṇāṁ) with destroyed family values (utsanna-kula-dharmāṇāṁ) dwell always in hell (narake niyataṁ vāso). (BG 1.43)

Arjuna sums up his disgruntled and confused state in the following words. “Alas (aho), how strange it is (bata) that (yad) we (vayam) are resolved (vyavasitā) to commit (kartuṁ) a great sin (mahat pāpaṁ)! Driven by the greed for royal happiness (rājya-sukha-lobhena), we are ready (udyatāḥ) to kill (hantuṁ) our own people (sva-janam). (BG 1.44) If (yadi) the sons of Dhṛtarāṣṭra (dhārtarāṣṭrā), with weapons in hand (śastra-pāṇayaḥ), were to kill (hanyus) me (mām) weaponless (aśastraṁ) and unresisting (apratīkāram) in the battle (raṇe), that (tan) would be (bhavet) better (kṣema-taraṁ) for me (me). (BG 1.45)”

Arjuna (arjunaḥ), thus (evam) speaking (uktvā) on the battlefield (saṅkhye), sat down (upāviśat) on the chariot (rathopastha), giving up (visṛjya) bow (cāpaṁ) and arrows (sa-śaraṁ), with his mind (mānasaḥ) distressed (saṁvigna) with grief (śoka). (BG 1.46)

Sin (pāpam) indeed (eva) will shelter (āśrayed) Arjuna (asmān) by killing (hatva) these (etān) aggressors (ātatāyinaḥ). Therefore (tasmān), they (vayaṁ) should not (nārhā) kill (hantuṁ) the sons of Dhṛtarāṣṭra (dhārtarāṣṭrān) along with their friends (sa-bāndhavān). How (kathaṁ) can Arjuna indeed (hi) be happy (sukhinaḥ syāma) by killing (hatvā) his own people (sva-janaṁ)? (BG 1.36) Even if (yady apy) they [the sons of Dhṛtarāṣṭra] (ete) do not (na) see (paśyanti) fault (doṣaṁ) in destroying a dynasty (kula-kṣaya-kṛtaṁ) and (ca) sin (pātakam) in harming friends (mitra-drohe) with their good sense stolen away by greed (lobhopahata-cetasaḥ), how (kathaṁ) could this be not known (na jñeyam) to Arjuna (asmābhiḥ)? How can the sin (pāpād ) associated with the fault (doṣaṁ) of destroying a dynasty (kula-kṣaya-kṛtaṁ) be given up (nivartitum) by Arjuna and others (asmān) who can foresee the outcome (prapaśyadbhir)? (BG 1.37-38)

When a dynasty is destroyed (kula-kṣaye praṇaśyanti), so are the eternal (sanātanāḥ) family values (kula-dharmāḥ). With the destruction (naṣṭe) of traditional values (dharme), it is said (uta), unrighteousness (adharmo) rules (’bhibhavaty) the entire family (kulaṁ kṛtsnam). (BG 1.39)

The two prominent reasons that emerge out of this section building up toward Arjuna’s conflicting heart are: (1) Sinful reactions will haunt Arjuna if he destroys his own dynasty. (2) Destruction of a dynasty would lead to the destruction of well-preserved traditional values (kula-dharmāḥ).

Seeing (dṛṣṭvemaṁ) his own people (sva-janaṁ) present (samupasthitam) with a desire to fight (yuyutsuṁ), the limbs of his body are quivering (sīdanti mama gātrāṇi) and his mouth is drying up (mukhaṁ ca pariśuṣyati). (BG 1.28) His body is trembling (vepathuś ca śarīre me), his hair is standing on end (roma-harṣaś ca jāyate), the Gāṇḍīva bow is slipping from his hand (gāṇḍīvaṁ sraṁsate hastāt), and his skin is, in fact, burning (tvak caiva paridahyate). (BG 1.29)

Arjuna is thus introspecting and experiencing self-awareness on the bodily platform. An outstanding quality of Arjuna that is shining forth here is his willingness to be vulnerable before Krishna along with his expressions of self-honesty. We can notice a stark contrast between the aforementioned diplomatic dealing of Duryodhana and this straightforward confession of Arjuna. After evaluating the situation through the lens of bodily compassion, Arjuna next puts forward his second line of reasoning, which is based on self-awareness on the mental platform.

He is unable to (na ca śaknomy) stand here any longer (avasthātuṁ) and his mind is reeling (bhramatīva ca me manaḥ). He sees (paśyāmi) only causes (nimittāni ca) of misfortune (viparītāni). (BG 1.30) And, he does not (na ca) foresee (anupaśyāmi) any good (śreyo) in killing (hatvā) his own people (sva-janam) in this battle (āhave). He does not (na) seek (kāṅkṣe) victory (vijayaṁ) or kingdom (na ca rājyaṁ) or happiness (sukhāni ca). (BG 1.31)

Arjuna begins to question everything. What (kiṁ) is the value of this kingdom (rājyena) for them (no)? What (kiṁ) is the value of the associated pleasure (bhogair) or life itself (jīvitena vā), when those for whose sake (yeṣām arthe) we (no) are desiring (kāṅkṣitaṁ) the kingdom pleasures (rājyaṁ bhogāḥ) and happiness (sukhāni ca) – those very persons (ta ime): teachers (ācāryāḥ), fathers (pitaraḥ), sons (putrās), grandfathers (tathaiva ca pitāmahāḥ), maternal uncles (mātulāḥ), fathers-in-law (śvaśurāḥ), grandsons (pautrāḥ), brothers-in-law (śyālāḥ) and other relatives (sambandhinas tathā) – are assembled on the battlefield (’vasthitā yuddhe) ready to give up their lives and wealth (prāṇāṁs tyaktvā dhanāni ca)? He does not (na) wish (icchāmi) to kill (hantum) them (etān) – even (api) for the sake of (hetoḥ) a kingdom spanning the three worlds (trailokya-rājyasya), what to speak of an Earthly kingdom (kiṁ nu mahī-kṛte) – even though they might otherwise kill him (ghnato ’pi). What pleasure will they derive from killing (nihatya) the sons of Dhṛtarāṣṭra (dhārtarāṣṭrān naḥ)? (BG 1.32-35)

In summary, Arjuna is considering two reasons for not fighting so far: (1) he is feeling bodily compassion toward his kith and kin, and (2) he is unable to foresee any good in killing his own people.

Dhṛtarāṣṭra asks (dhṛtarāṣṭra uvāca) Sañjaya (sañjaya), “On the field of justice (dharma-kṣetre), Kurukṣetra (kuru-kṣetre), my sons (māmakāḥ) and the sons of Pāṇḍu (pāṇḍavāś caiva) are assembled (samavetā) desiring to fight (yuyutsavaḥ). What (kim) did they do (akurvata )?” (BG 1.1) Sañjaya responds as follows. After seeing (dṛṣṭvā tu) the marshalled (vyūḍhaṁ) Pāṇḍava army (pāṇḍavānīkaṁ), King (rājā) Duryodhana (duryodhanas) then (tadā) approaching (upasaṅgamya) his teacher [Droṇācārya] (ācāryam) spoke (abravīt) these words (vacanam). (BG 1.2)

Duryodhana, although internally nervous and anxious, exudes false confidence in front of his teacher. Desiring to manipulate his teacher, he says, “O teacher (ācārya), behold this (paśyaitāṁ) great army (mahatīṁ camūm) of the sons of Pāṇḍu (pāṇḍu-putrānām), arranged (vyūḍhāṁ) by your (tava) intelligent (dhīmatā) disciple (śiṣyeṇa), the son of Drupada (drupada-putreṇa).” (BG 1.3) Duryodhana is making sure to mention the name of Drupada as he is aware of a long-standing rivalry between his teacher, Droṇācārya and Drupada. In this way, Duryodhana is trying to incite Droṇācārya‘s anger. The strength of one’s character can be evaluated by one’s ability to face and honestly represent one’s emotions before a trusted teacher. Here, Duryodhana is concealing his weakness by misrepresenting his emotions before his teacher.

Duryodhana, with an aim to pacify his fearful heart, now resorts to comparing the strengths of the two sides. He first lists down the warriors on the side of the Pāṇḍavas. Here (atra) are the heroes (śūrā) and great archers (maheṣv-āsā) equal to Bhīma and Arjuna (bhīmārjuna-samā ) in fighting (yudhi): Yuyudhāna, Virāṭa (yuyudhāno virāṭaś ca), and the great fighter (mahā-rathaḥ) – Drupada (drupadaś ca ). (BG 1.4) Duryodhana is particularly fearful of the valor of Bhīma and Arjuna and hence he could not avoid mentioning them in his comparison report. Also, note that he lists down Drupada as a great fighter owing to the aforementioned reason.

Duryodhana continues on. Dhṛṣṭaketu (dhṛṣṭaketuś), Cekitāna (cekitānaḥ), the powerful (vīryavān) Kāśirāja (kāśirājaś ca), Purujit (purujit), Kuntibhoja (kuntibhojaś ca), and the leader among men (nara-puṅgavaḥ) – Śaibya (śaibyaś ca), the mighty (vikrānta) Yudhāmanyu (yudhāmanyuś ca), the powerful (vīryavān) Uttamaujā (uttamaujāś ca), the son of Subhadrā (saubhadro) and the sons of Draupadī (draupadeyāś ca) – all of them (sarva) are certainly (eva) great fighters (mahā-rathāḥ). (BG 1.5–6)

Henceforth, addressing Droṇācārya as the best of the twice-born, Duryodhana draws his teacher’s attention to the side of the Kauravas. “Take note of (tān nibodha) the captains of my army (nāyakā mama sainyasya), who are specially qualified (viśiṣṭā ye) to lead side (asmākaṁ tu). I am speaking this to you (tān bravīmi te) for our information (saṁjñārthaṁ): yourself (bhavān), Bhīṣma, Karṇa (bhīṣmaś ca karṇaś ca), Kṛpa (kṛpaś ca) who is always victorious in battle (samitiṁ-jayaḥ), Aśvatthāmā, Vikarṇa (aśvatthāmā vikarṇaś ca) and the son of Somadatta (saumadattis tathaiva ca).” (BG 1.7–8)

Duryodhana next pridefully claims that many other heroes (anye ca bahavaḥ śūrā) are ready to give up their lives (tyakta-jīvitāḥ) for his sake (mad-arthe). They are capable of attacking with sundry weapons (nānā-śastra-praharaṇāḥ), and all are expert in battle (sarve yuddha-viśāradāḥ). (BG 1.9) When one is disconnected from one’s essential reality, all one is left with are external resources, either pertaining to one’s own body or other supporters. That’s where one finds a false sense of security. Duryodhana is vividly exemplifying this state of the mind.

Maintaining the same vainglorious spirit, Duryodhana furthermore proclaims that being protected by Bhīṣma (bhīṣmābhirakṣitam), their (tad asmākaṁ) strength (balaṁ) is unlimited (aparyāptaṁ), but (tv) the strength (balaṁ) of the Pāṇḍavas (idam eteṣāṁ), being protected by Bhīma (bhīmābhirakṣitam), is limited (paryāptaṁ). (BG 1.10) Duryodhana then orders all the members (bhavantaḥ sarva) of his army to firmly (eva hi) protect (evābhirakṣantu) Bhīṣma (bhīṣmam) by standing (avasthitāḥ) at all (sarveṣu) the assigned (yathā-bhāgam) points (ayaneṣu ca). (BG 1.11)

It is said (prāhur) that there is an imperishable banyan tree (aśvatthaṁ avyayam) with its roots up (ūrdhva-mūlam) and its branches down (adhaḥ-śākham) whose (yasya) leaves (parṇāni) are the Vedic hymns (chandāṁsi). One who knows this tree (yas taṁ veda) is the knower of the Vedas (sa veda-vit). (BG 15.1) Its branches (tasya śākhā) extend (prasṛtās) down and up (adhaś cordhvaṁ), grown by the three modes of material nature (guṇa-pravṛddhā) with its twigs being the sense objects (viṣaya-pravālāḥ). Its roots (mūlāni), also (ca) extending (anusantatāni) down (adhaś), are bound to the fruitive actions (karmānubandhīni) in human society (manuṣya-loke). (BG 15.2)

In this world (iha), neither (na) the form of this tree (rūpam asya) as such (tathā) is perceived (upalabhyate), nor its end (nānto), nor its beginning (na cādir), nor its foundation (na ca sampratiṣṭhā). Cutting down (chittvā) this (enaṁ) very strongly rooted (su-virūḍha-mūlam) banyan tree (aśvattham) with a firm (dṛḍhena) weapon of detachment (asaṅga-śastreṇa), thereafter (tataḥ), one must seek (parimārgitavyaṁ) that place (padaṁ tat) from where, having gone (yasmin gatā), one never returns (na nivartanti bhūyaḥ). And (ca), one must submit (prapadye) to that Primeval (adyaṁ) Person alone (tam eva puruṣaṁ) from whom every initiative (pravṛttiḥ) has extended (yataḥ prasṛtā) since time immemorial (purāṇī). (BG 15.3-4)

Krishna next elaborates on the qualifications necessary to escape the illusory banyan tree and go to the eternal spiritual abode. Free from false prestige (nirmāna) and illusion (mohā), having conquered the fault of association [with matter] (jita-saṅga-doṣā), eternally fixed on the Higher Self (adhyātma-nityā), disassociated (vinivṛtta) from lusty desires (kāmāḥ), liberated (vimuktāḥ) from the dualities (dvandvair) like happiness and distress (sukha-duḥkha-saṁjñair), the unbewildered (amūḍhāḥ) go (gacchanty) to that (tat) eternal (avyayaṁ) place (padam). (BG 15.5)

On the other hand, those who are not deluded, the great souls (mahātmānas), are under the shelter (āśritāḥ) of the divine nature (daivīṁ prakṛtim). They are exclusively (ananya-manaso) and directly engaged in Krishna’s devotional service (bhajanty) knowing (jñātvā) Krishna as the inexhaustible (avyayam) source of everyone (bhūtādim). (BG 9.13) How exactly are they engaged? Always (satataṁ) chanting Krishna’s (māṁ) glories (kīrtayanto), endeavoring (yatantaś) with great determination (dṛḍha-vratāḥ), and bowing down (namasyantaś) before Krishna (māṁ), these great souls are eternally engaged (nitya-yuktā) with devotion (bhaktyā). (BG 9.14)

Yet others (anye), who engage in the sacrifice of knowledge (jñāna-yajñena), worship Krishna (mām) in oneness (ekatvena), in diverse forms (pṛthaktvena bahudhā), or in the universal form (viśvato-mukham). (BG 9.15) These are 3 categories of indirect worshipers of Krishna, who had been referred to as jñānīs (in BG 7.16) but of lower order. Those who deride the transcendental form of Krishna (BG 9.11–12) tend to worship Krishna in oneness or think of themselves as one with Krishna.

Krishna next elaborates on the vision of the worshipers of the universal form, who conceive of Krishna’s universal form within the manifest universe. They see Krishna (ahaṁ) as the ritual (kratur), the sacrifice (yajñaḥ), the oblation (svadhā), the healing herb (auṣadham), the transcendental chant (mantro), the clarified butter (ājyam), the fire (agnir), and the offering (hutam). (BG 9.16)

Not knowing (ajānanto) Krishna’s transcendental position (paraṁ bhāvam) as the Supreme Lord of all (mama bhūta-maheśvaram), ignorant fools (mūḍhā) deride (avajānanti) Krishna (māṁ) when He appears in His human form (mānuṣīṁ tanum āśritam). (BG 9.11) Those who are thus bewildered (mohinīṁ śritāḥ) are attracted by demonic (rākṣasīm) and atheistic (āsurīṁ) views. In that deluded condition (vicetasaḥ), they are baffled (mogha) in their hopes (āśā), their fruitive activities (karmāṇo), and their knowledge (jñānā). (BG 9.12)

This indirect and mysterious reciprocation of Krishna with those with atheistic mindset through His material energy perpetuates atheistic conditions in this world. Furthermore, bafflement in hopes leads to depression, and bafflement in fruitive activities leads to frustration, but owing to bafflement in knowledge, one feels elusively comfortable amidst all miseries despite experiencing periodic depression and frustration.